My Monitors History

Remember alley cat on CGA?

I consider myself to be relatively new to the computing world, having been introduced to my first ever personal computer in the late 1980’s. However, that being the 80’s I can still say that I’m probably in the golden age of computer literacy. I’m old enough to remember the rise in popularity of computers in our day-to-day living, and yet still young enough to have experienced technology grow along with me. And I’m likely to be at the stage when I’ll be among the movers and shakers of the technology world in the near future.

Quarter-life crisis, anyone? Nah. I’ll take a quarter-life opportunity to review what I’ve thought of technology these short years of my stay on this world so far, in terms of monitors.

My first computer was an IBM PC XT clone, with a monitor that displayed any color as long as it was green. I believe that time it was called the Hercules graphics adapter. One could display a cool 80 x 25 screen of text of about 720 x 350 resolution. Wow, wasn’t that advanced for its time, in terms of resolution? Sadly, though, the Hercules was only 1-bit, meaning each pixel is either on or off. Or you could only see green or black.

Then came the CGA monitors for me, or the Color Graphics Adapter. Games were now cool to play, with the CGA’s ability to render sixteen colors. The Hercules and CGA graphics cards actually came out at approximately the same time. The CGA was, well, colored. But the Hercules cards had higher resolution. Why did we have to have this tradeoff back then, huh?

History would say that the next logical steps in progression would be the EGA. But the next computer I got my hands on had already supported SVGA, and then a few years after, XGA-graphics, which has long been considered the standard (i.e., 1024×768 resolution). By then I was already playing games that were a bit more graphics-intensive than usual, like first-person shooters and some games intended for playing over the local area network.

These days, I still continue to use the XGA-resolution on my laptop, since most laptops only support LCD resolutions of up to 1024×768 (but graphics cards could support higher resolutions when external monitors are plugged in). On my desktop, however, I’ve pretty much gotten used to Super XGA, or 1280×1024–something you can only have comfortably with monitor sizes of 17″ or higher (otherwise, everything would be so darned small). I’m still using CRT, though, and I’m hopeful my next computer purchase would include a larger LCD screen, like David’s.

Here’s a bit of information on computer display standard nomenclature I found on answers.com.

May 31st, 2006 Posted by J. Angelo Racoma in Graphics cards, Other at 9:05 pm Comment Now! »

Samsung SyncMaster 915N Review

Samsung SyncMaster 915N A little while back I decided that I could not deal with my CRT anymore. I was staring at a device for eight or more hours a day and it seemed like every day I had a headache. No matter what I set the refresh rate to, I just couldn’t deal with it anymore, not to mention the lack of screen real estate that I had on it.

I splurged and bought a 19″ LCD to augment, but more or less replace my 17″ CRT monitor, and it really does make a difference. The monitor I chose was the Samsung SyncMaster 915N. While it does not have some of the newer features, it is a great deal, and is working rather well for me, but that does not mean it is perfect either.

Specifications
Response Time: 8ms
Viewing Angle: 160 / 160 (Horizontal / Vertical)
Contrast Ratio: 700:1 (Typical)
Resolution: 1280 x 1024 (Native)
Brightness: 300 cd/m2

Overall
What I really like about this monitor is the clarity, and simplicity, but the lack of a DVI port is a bit bothersome. I personally have not noticed much of a difference not having it, and it is still quite an improvement over my older monitor. The bezel around the monitor, is a little thicker than some might like, but I think it is perfect, especially since it is thinner than many other models currently on the market, and the simple matte black finish matches everything I own for my computer.

The things I really dislike about the SyncMaster 915N are few, but very noticeable during use. One of my biggest complaints is that the viewing angle seems a little horrible. If you are too far to the sides, it becomes quickly unreadable, and while most of the time I am front and center with the monitor, for entertaining friends, I have noticed some issues. Another noticeable problem is that the buttons on the monitor are basically unreadable without the brightest daytime conditions, thus making it difficult to edit the settings, which depending on the lighting conditions you will need to do.

One last slight peeve with the LCD is that you can only tilt the screen. There are no height adjustment options, and in this day and age, that seems a little odd to me, as putting a telephone book under the monitor for taller people like myself, and removing it for shorter people like my wife can be very annoying, but it can be something necessary for proper long term comfort.

I still recommend this monitor, but feel it lacks in features and is falling quickly behind the curve compared to other monitors currently out on the market for a few more dollars.

May 22nd, 2006 Posted by David in Samsung at 11:38 am 2 Comments »

Monitors Blog

My Monitors History

Samsung SyncMaster 915N Review

Categories

Recent Posts